Location : CACIM > Publications/Elizabeth Abraham
| PUBLICATIONS OF CRITICAL ENGAGEMENT
SERIES |
|||||
| The 2008-09 Process |
|||||
|
A Reading of Dalit Participation in WSF 2004 About this monograph The concept of
‘open space’ adopted
by the World Social Forum (WSF) made it more
than just an ‘anti-globalisation
platform’. It moved it in the direction of a more open new politics of
diversity and
pluralism. The idea that there cannot be a single counter
narrative to the system of oppression,
and the recognition of diversity and pluralism, were inevitable
prerequisites for
fostering the new politics. It was an acknowledgement
of diverse forms of struggles and
movements that were taking place in different parts of the world.
The
concept of open space has been much
discussed in the debates and literature
that evolved around the WSF. Most of
the deliberations have centred on the linearity
of the ‘open space’, whether the
space was controlled top-down or bottom-up, the
grammar and language of the concept,
the liminality of the space, the indeterminacy of
the process, etc.
The
Mumbai 2004 WSF is celebrated for
its radical shift from earlier Forums and for the celebration of
diversities. The
relevance of open space to silenced communities
is therefore an important domain for
exploration. The monograph attempts to see the
openness of ‘open space’. Is the
openness limited to the participation or representation
of different groups ? Or is it defined
through the interaction and intercommunication
of different possible worlds ? Or is
the Forum just a space for showcasing different
groups and movements ?
Immediately after WSF 2004, most of the
writings marked the significant political presence of dalits through
seminars,
demonstrations, and cultural shows. While dalit
presence in the Indian socio-economic
and cultural sphere is marginal, what was the
significance of dalit interaction with
the WSF’s open space ? This question is all the
more relevant as the WSF took place in
a space where deeply entangled upper caste
and dalit histories confront each
other. The present study is an exploration of the way
the concept of open space was
encountered by the dalit section of Indian society, and
how the Forum responded to the voices
of dalit movements in the country.
|
||||
